Security & Verification

A security reviewer's summary of the cryptography behind Lolly's Content Credentials, verification and encryption - the standards it implements, the primitives it uses, how trust is earned and how all of it is tested. This is the public companion to the deeper Content Credentials - Engineering guide. The operator narrative lives in Lolly for Operators.

The short version: verification is entirely on-device, the crypto is standards-based and built on the platform's own WebCrypto engine, and every claim is backed by a test - known-answer vectors, adversarial forgery/replay tests, fuzzing and conformance against independent tools.

Verification is on-device

Everything Lolly verifies, it verifies locally, offline, without uploading the file. Dropping a file on /verify (or lolly validate <file>) parses it, walks its Content Credential, re-checks the signature and the byte-hash binding and renders a verdict. It all runs in your browser or on your machine. There is no verification server.

signed by Lollyvector SVG2026-08-24Провери самGet the signed file13 paths~7.6k nodes14 groups84 KBsigned by Lollyvector SVG2026-08-24Провери самGet the signed file13 paths~7.6k nodes14 groups84 KB

Here is a real check, start to finish. This is the generated Queensland storm from our AI stance. It is a Gemini image Lolly opened, resized and exported to WebP. Drop it on /verify and the whole story comes back: a green Made with Lolly verdict, the two key validations (credential intact, bytes unchanged), the provenance scorecard and an honest GEN AI flag because a machine made the pixels. None of it left your device to get there.

signed by Lollyvector SVG2026-08-24AI generatedПровери самGet the signed file145 paths~9.8k nodes72 groups2 images339 KBsigned by Lollyvector SVG2026-08-24AI generatedПровери самGet the signed file145 paths~9.4k nodes72 groups2 images258 KB

AI declares itself in the same verdict, as a badge nobody has to go looking for. The file was generated, and its credential says so. Lolly reads that assertion back out and surfaces it plainly, alongside the note that a Google model very likely stamped an invisible SynthID watermark into the pixels too.

signed by Lollyvector SVG2026-08-24Провери самGet the signed file12 paths~6.4k nodes9 groups71 KBsigned by Lollyvector SVG2026-08-24Провери самGet the signed file12 paths~6.4k nodes9 groups71 KB

The engine's crypto core is platform-agnostic and uses only globalThis.crypto / WebCrypto. There is no bespoke crypto library, no Node-only APIs and no network calls anywhere in the engine. In the web app, verification makes no network request to any third party. The only fetch it can ever make is the opt-in deep scan's one-time detector download, from the app's own origin. Even a SEAL record whose signing key lives in DNS is reported as "no key resolver" rather than routed through a third-party DNS-over-HTTPS service (the desktop and command-line shells resolve such keys through your own machine's DNS, with no third party involved).

Standards implemented

Cryptographic primitives

• Signing (Content Credentials, catalog integrity, issued certificates): ECDSA P-256 / ES256 with SHA-256. There are two signer paths and the difference is worth stating precisely. An enrolled identity's device key is generated non-extractable and kept in IndexedDB: even Lolly's own code can only ask it to sign, never read it. The default anonymous signer is a throwaway keypair minted per export inside the page, used once and dropped with the export. Neither key is ever transmitted.
• Verifying (to accept the whole C2PA ecosystem): ECDSA P-256/384/521, RSA PKCS#1 v1.5, RSA-PSS and Ed25519.
• Encryption: AES-256 for the Strong PDF lock (PDF 2.0 / R6) and Strong locked downloads (WinZip AE-2), with PBKDF2 key derivation and HMAC authentication. The Standard tiers (40-bit RC4 for PDF, ZipCrypto for zip) are labelled as quick, universal deterrents. Reach for Strong for anything sensitive.
• Hashing: SHA-256 throughout (SHA-384/512 where a curve or algorithm requires it).

signed by Lollyvector SVG2026-08-24Провери самGet the signed file11 paths~4.4k nodes11 groups1 image51 KBsigned by Lollyvector SVG2026-08-24Провери самGet the signed file11 paths~4.4k nodes11 groups1 image51 KB

All of the above run on the platform's audited WebCrypto implementation. The two symmetric ciphers use a small in-house block layer only because WebCrypto exposes no raw AES block. This layer is used encrypt-only, over your own content, never as a decryption oracle.

How "trusted" is earned

Lolly reports the trust a file can actually prove, in explicit tiers:

• valid - the credential is intact and the byte-hash binding holds: the file is unaltered since signing. An un-enrolled export is valid but signed anonymously (untrusted). That's the default, and it's honest.
• trusted - additionally, the signer's certificate chain cryptographically reaches a pinned trust anchor and the claim signature verifies under that signer's key and nothing else failed. Both conditions together are what make a copied ("replayed") signer certificate worthless to an attacker: it can't produce a claim signature that verifies under the real owner's non-extractable key.

Trust anchors are public certificates only. They are the C2PA ecosystem roots (Google, Adobe, the CAI trust list, camera makers, AI providers) plus Lolly's own public root. Presence on the list never confers trust by itself. Trust always requires the live chain walk and signature check above. Chain walking is bounded (a capped number of intermediates, parsed defensively) so a hostile certificate chain can't exhaust resources.

There is no timestamp authority yet, so an authentic-but-expired signature surfaces the signer's identity while staying trusted: false. It proves who, not when. An RFC 3161 timestamp countersignature is on the roadmap.

Complementary provenance signals

Beyond the C2PA credential, Verify surfaces several read-only signals. Each is an honest heuristic that only ever adds confidence, never a false alarm:

• The Lolly Imprint - an invisible pixel watermark, on by default, that survives a screenshot or re-save (where the credential dies to any container change). Presence-only, no personal data. It is security-through-obscurity: casual-stripping cover, not a hardened defence. It complements the credential rather than replacing it.
• SEAL byte-level signatures, AI-generated-content declarations, third-party pixel-watermark deep scans (opt-in, one-time on-device model download) and hidden-data detection. All of these run locally.

Lolly's provenance strategy is read-broad, embed-narrow: it reads many signals but writes only three - C2PA, its own Imprint and an opt-in durable mark in Adobe's TrustMark format (a neural pass plus a one-time model download, so it is off by default). That keeps the write-side attack surface small, and it is exactly what the export panel shows: three named switches, each a separate mechanism, rather than one blanket "protect this" claim.

signed by Lollyvector SVG2026-08-24Провери самGet the signed file21 paths~1.5k nodes35 groups4 images25 KBsigned by Lollyvector SVG2026-08-24Провери самGet the signed file21 paths~1.5k nodes35 groups4 images25 KB

How it's assured

An automated test in the repository (npm test) backs every cryptographic claim above:

• Known-answer tests (KATs). Byte-for-byte fixed vectors: the CBOR encoder, the PDF R6 encryption vector, the zip CRC/AE-2 output and the canonical-JSON signing form are each pinned to an exact expected byte string, so an accidental change is caught immediately.
• Adversarial tests. Signer-replay, lifted-signature, forged-intermediate and identity-impersonation attempts are all asserted to resolve to untrusted. Tampering any covered byte (inside the manifest, the claim, an assertion or the file body) is asserted to break the correct check.
• Fuzzing. Hostile, truncated and deeply-nested inputs run through the C2PA, CBOR and X.509 parsers with a regression corpus. The tests assert the parsers fail closed: no crash, no runaway recursion or allocation.
• Independent conformance. The reference tools Lolly interoperates with validate its output: c2patool (C2PA), qpdf (PDF) and Adobe's own reference implementation for TrustMark. Lolly's verifier is also proven against a manifest signed by an entirely independent producer, not just its own round-trip.
• Supply chain. A full CycloneDX SBOM is generated deterministically and drift-checked in CI, and npm audit blocks any high- or critical-severity dependency advisory from landing.
• Static analysis. An Opengrep SAST job runs on every push and pull request. Lolly's own rules (.github/opengrep/) scan the whole tree - submodules included, which is what makes the scan real rather than nominal - and block on a finding. The upstream community rule packs run alongside them, diff-only against the merge base, and are advisory: they resolve over a third-party registry, so a gate there would go red on someone else's outage.

The cryptography and parsers are additionally undergoing SUSE's enterprise-scale security hardening. They are strong by design today. Where a contract calls for certified assurance, deploy Lolly as one layer of defence-in-depth.

Design boundaries (worth having straight)

• *Content Credentials are tamper-evident, not tamper-proof.* They detect alteration cryptographically and offline. They don't prevent it. That is exactly what makes fully offline verification possible.
• The on-device signer is anonymous by design unless you enrol a verified identity. No real credential ever leaves the device.
• Tool hooks are not a security sandbox by default. A tool's optional hooks.js runs with the host bridge injected but, in a browser shell, executes in the page's realm. Worker isolation ships as a per-tool opt-in - a manifest declaring isolate: true runs its hooks off-thread in a Worker, with the in-realm path as the fallback where no Worker executor exists - so the default remains in-realm. Run only tools you've reviewed. An org running a shared catalog can gate it through Git review.
• Interoperability: two containers have no standardised C2PA mapping yet, so Lolly gives each a home of its own - WebM (the manifest as a Matroska part) and Ogg/Opus (the store as a C2PA= comment field, its byte range excluded from the binding so the audio still hashes identically). Lolly's own verifier reads both; a third-party tool will not. Every other format Lolly stamps uses its spec-defined place - MP4, M4A, AVIF, MP3 and WAV among them - and verifies in third-party tools by default.

Reporting a vulnerability

Found something? Report it privately: fitzy+security@suse.com, the Report a vulnerability button on any lolly-tools repository or the machine-readable /.well-known/security.txt. The full policy, scope and safe-harbour statement live in SECURITY.md. We practise coordinated disclosure and credit reporters in the fix notes.

Where to go next

• Verify It Yourself - every checkable claim on this page and the privacy policy as a runnable procedure: the exact commands and the output you should see.
• Server Surface - the complete inventory of what runs server-side (two optional components) versus on-device.
• Content Credentials - Engineering - the engine contracts, trust anchors, CA service and threat model in full.
• Content Credentials Identity - how verified-identity enrolment and the Lolly CA work.
• Lolly for Operators - provenance, encryption and air-gap deployment in context.
• Privacy Policy - the formal "collects nothing, uploads nothing" statement.